Mechanical thrombectomy alone may be a feasible strategy during rescue PCI for STEMI patients with mild underlying atherosclerotic burden, avoiding the need for stenting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for thrombectomy alone in select rescue PCI; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Coronary reperfusion strategies for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) include primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravenous thrombolytic agents and recently mechanical thrombectomy alone during PCI, the latter reserved for those without significant residual disease post-thrombectomy. We describe the success of 'mechanical thrombectomy alone' in two young patients undergoing rescue angioplasty at our institution. Both patients were thrombolysed for inferior STEMI. During rescue PCI, post-thrombus aspiration, mild underlying atherosclerotic burden was detected in both patients, thus possibly obviating the need for further balloon angioplasty or stenting. Cost and compliance with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was an additional factor to avoid stenting. Both patients received aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin and additional standard therapy for myocardial infarction (MI). Medication compliance was ensured by providing 1 month DAPT at no extra cost. Short-term follow-up at 1 and 3 months, for both patients was uneventful. Two-year, long-term follow-up, available for one patient has been uneventful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamil et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: