Why the study?
Does bipolar prosthesis improve Nottingham Health Profile scores compared to unipolar prosthesis or internal fixation in patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures?
Does bipolar prosthesis improve Nottingham Health Profile scores compared to unipolar prosthesis or internal fixation in patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Postal assessment using the Nottingham Health Profile provides a satisfactory response rate and suggests a trend toward better outcomes with bipolar prostheses in younger patients with hip fractures.
We report a randomised prospective trial of the early results of three types of treatment for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. We used a questionnaire sent to patients at about six months (Nottingham Health Profile, NHP) in addition to clinical assessments. There was a 67.4% usable response to the questionnaire, similar to that in other studies using the NHP. There were more responders from younger patients, those walking independently before injury and those with higher mental test scores on admission. In the younger group (65 to 79 years) we found a trend for better scores in most NHP indices after the use of a bipolar prosthesis rather than a unipolar prosthesis or internal fixation, particularly for social function, pain and physical mobility. Postal assessment using the NHP gave a satisfactory response rate even in the elderly, and can provide an extra assessment to complement or replace hospital follow-up in some circumstances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calder et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: