Key result
Nottingham Hip Fracture Score predicts functional independence well and mortality moderately but fails for postoperative complications.
Why the study?
Independent validation of risk scores after hip fracture is uncommon, particularly for evaluating outcomes other than death.
Does the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score accurately predict postoperative outcomes in hip fracture patients compared to AMTS and ASA grade?
Cohort (n=3,208)
Does the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score accurately predict postoperative outcomes in hip fracture patients compared to AMTS and ASA grade?
The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score is a valid tool for predicting functional outcomes and mortality after hip fracture surgery, though it is less effective for predicting length of stay and complications.
NHFS may aid risk stratification for function and mortality after hip fracture; leaves open incremental value over AMTS/ASA and utility for complications.
Objectives: Independent validation of risk scores after hip fracture is uncommon, particularly for evaluation of outcomes other than death. We aimed to assess the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) for prediction of mortality, physical function, length of stay and postoperative complications. Design: Analysis of routinely collected prospective data. Setting and Participants: Consecutive hip fracture patients were identified from the Northumbria hip fracture database between 2014-2018. Patients were excluded if they were not surgically managed or if scores for predictive variables were missing. Methods: C-statistics were calculated to test the discriminant ability of the NHFS, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), and ASA grade for in-hospital, 30- and 120-day mortality, functional independence at discharge, 30-days and 120-days, length of stay, and postoperative complications. Results We analysed data from 3208 individuals, mean age 82.6 (SD 8.6). 2192 (70.9%) were female. 194 (6.3%) died during the first 30-days, 1686 (54.5%) were discharged to their own home, 211 (6.8%) had no functional mobility at 120-days, 141 (4.6%) experienced a postoperative complication. The median length of stay was 18 days (IQR 8-28). For mortality, c-statistics for the NHFS ranged from 0.68-0.69, similar to ASA and AMTS. For functional independence, the c-statistics for the NHFS ranged from 0.74-0.83, similar to AMTS (0.61-0.82) and better than the ASA grade (0.68-0.71). Length of stay was significantly correlated with each score (p<0.001 by Jonckheere-Terpstra test); NHFS and AMTS showed inverted U-shaped relationships with length of stay. The best predictor of postoperative complications was ASA grade (0.56-0.64), whilst NHFS (0.49-0.59) and AMTS (0.48-0.57) performed similarly poorly. Conclusions and Implications: The NHFS performed consistently well in predicting functional outcomes, moderately in predicting mortality, but less well in predicting length of stay and complications. There remains room for improvement by adding further predictors such as measures of physical performance in future analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doherty et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in hip fracture (n=3,208). Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) vs. Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and ASA grade was evaluated on mortality, physical function, length of stay and postoperative complications. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score predicted functional independence well (c-statistic 0.74-0.83) and mortality moderately (0.68-0.69), but performed poorly for postoperative complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: