Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study represents the first investigation of psychological skills in Formula 1 (F1) and Formula 2 (F2) drivers, addressing a critical gap in motorsport psychology research. Ten professional drivers (5 F1, 5 F2; all male; age = 24 ± 4 years) completed the Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI-28) assessing seven psychological domains, with independent samples t -tests comparing groups using Cohen’s d effect sizes. Although total ACSI-28 scores showed no significant difference ( p = 0.47), F1 drivers demonstrated superior concentration (M = 9.4 vs. 6.8, d = 1.31, p = 0.03) and confidence/achievement motivation (M = 11.2 vs. 9.6, d = 1.60, p = 0.04). Medium effect sizes favoured F1 drivers for coping with adversity ( d = 0.63) and peaking under pressure ( d = 0.56), while F2 drivers showed advantages in goal-setting ( d = 0.34) and freedom from worry ( d = 0.22). Elite motorsport performance is distinguished by specific psychological capabilities that relate to the demands of high-pressure competition. F1 drivers’ marked advantages in concentration and confidence suggest these domains are critical determinants of success at motorsport’s pinnacle. The pattern of F2 advantages in systematic preparation ( d = 0.34, non-significant) alongside F1 superiority in pressure response suggests a preliminary hypothesis of developmental progression in psychological skill emphasis that warrants further investigation. These findings provide evidence-based foundations for talent development and targeted interventions in elite motorsport.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKnight et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: