Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Earlier observations that substitution of the aromatic nucleus of an arylamino/nitro carcinogen with either a sulphonic acid substituent or two methyl groups placed ortho to the nitrogen substituent renders the molecule non-carcinogenic have been extended via studies conducted in vitro. 4-Aminobiphenyl-4'-sulphonic acid has been synthesized and found to be non-mutagenic in the Salmonella mutation assay when tested under conditions where 4-aminobiphenyl was mutagenic. It is concluded that this sulphonic acid derivative may prove non-carcinogenic to rodents. In contrast to the non-carcinogenicity and non-mutagenicity reported for 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine, 3,5-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl is approximately as mutagenic as 4-aminobiphenyl. It is therefore concluded that this material is potentially carcinogenic and that the loss of mutagenic activity observed for tetramethylbenzidine may be a structurally specific rather than a general phenomenon. In contrast, 3,5-dimethyl-4-nitrobiphenyl was much less mutagenic than 4-nitrobiphenyl. 9,9'-Bijulolidyl, a derivative of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine, was also found to be non-mutagenic. The general significance of these findings to the employment of structure-activity relationships in the design of non-mutagenic/non-carcinogenic molecules is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashby et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: