Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon−carbon bond cleavage of biphenylene was achieved with (C 5 Me 5 )M(C 2 H 4 ) 2 (M = Rh, Co) to give the bimetallic species (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 M 2 (2,2‘-biphenyl). The isomorphous solid state X-ray structures of these complexes showed the biphenyl substrate to be σ-coordinated to one metal and η 4 -bound to the other. These complexes display dynamic behavior, interchanging the σ- and π-bonding. Variable-temperature NMR studies were performed on both binuclear species, and the energy barrier for interconversion of the two (C 5 Me 5 ) fragments was calculated to be Δ G ⧧ (350 K) = 16.8 kcal/mol and Δ G ⧧ (248 K) = 11.4 kcal/mol for the rhodium and cobalt complexes, respectively. (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Rh 2 (2,2‘-biphenyl) reacted with CO to give (C 5 Me 5 )Rh(CO) 2 and (C 5 Me 5 )Rh(CO)(2,2‘-biphenyl), while the cobalt analog gave (C 5 Me 5 )Co(CO) 2 and fluorenone. (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Co 2 (2,2‘-biphenyl) gave (C 5 Me 5 )Co(PMe 3 ) 2 and (C 5 Me 5 )Co(PMe 3 )(2,2‘-biphenyl) when reacted with PMe 3, as determined by X-ray crystallography of the latter complex. Both complexes were found to be resistant to hydrogenation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perthuisot et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: