Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare dental hospital admissions in a total state birth population of Indigenous and non-Indigenous children aged under five years in Western Australia. METHODS: Midwives' notification data were linked to databases of deaths, admissions, birth defects and intellectual disability. Births during 1980-1995 were followed until five years of age (n = 383,665). Dental admissions were classified by ICD-9 principal diagnosis categories. RESULTS: There were 738 dental admissions for 665 children aged up to five years of Indigenous mothers (n = 20,921). Indigenous children comprised 6.3% of all children having a dental admission in this age group; 3.2% of children with Indigenous mothers had a dental admission compared with 2.7% of non-Indigenous children. Overall, 8.7% (n = 58) of Indigenous children with a dental admission had a birth defect and 5.5% (n = 23) had an intellectual disability (compared to 8.8% and 3.2%). Indigenous children were four times more likely to be diagnosed with oral soft tissue diseases than non-Indigenous children, and less likely to be categorized as having diseases of the dental hard tissues. Indigenous children were more likely to have a longer dental admission. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide important findings regarding hospital admissions for Indigenous children. Admissions for disorders of the soft tissues are more common in Indigenous children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slack‐Smith et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: