Key result
Light-to-moderate alcohol intake is linked to ~20% lower incident heart failure risk vs. never drinking.
Meta-Analysis
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure is highly prevalent among older adults and is associated with high treatment costs. Identifying modifiable determinants of heart failure may help in prevention. Alcohol consumption has emerged as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Although many studies have suggested a positive association between heavy drinking and cardiomyopathy, the association between infrequent or light-to-moderate drinking and heart failure risk has been less conclusive. PURPOSE: To examine the relation between various levels of alcohol intake and incident heart failure. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 6 studies obtained through a PubMed literature search. Alcohol drinkers were classified as never, former, and current drinkers of 0.1 to 0.9, 1 to 7, 8 to 14, and > 14 drinks per week. RESULTS: Compared with never drinkers, the pooled relative risks were 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.51) for former drinkers, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.98), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.88), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.95) for current drinkers of 0.1 to 0.9, 1 to 7, 8 to 14, and > 14 drinks per week, respectively, in a random effects model. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that infrequent and light-to-moderate drinking is associated with a lower risk of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Padilla et al. (2010) conducted a meta-analysis in Incident heart failure. Alcohol consumption (former and current drinkers of 0.1-0.9, 1-7, 8-14, and >14 drinks/week) vs. Never drinkers was evaluated on Incident heart failure (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88). Light-to-moderate alcohol intake (1-7 drinks/week) was associated with a lower risk of incident heart failure compared with never drinking (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.73-0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: