Why the study?
Does the CES1 c.428G>A single nucleotide variation increase the antiplatelet effects and active metabolite concentrations of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers?
Does the CES1 c.428G>A single nucleotide variation increase the antiplatelet effects and active metabolite concentrations of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers?
The CES1 c.428G>A genetic variant significantly increases clopidogrel active metabolite levels and antiplatelet effects by impairing its hydrolysis into inactive metabolites.
Does not support CES1 genotyping to guide clopidogrel use; hypothesis-generating for outcomes research in patients.
Carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) hydrolyzes the prodrug clopidogrel to an inactive carboxylic acid metabolite. We studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 600 mg oral clopidogrel in healthy white volunteers, including 10 carriers and 12 noncarriers of CES1 c.428G>A (p.Gly143Glu, rs71647871) single nucleotide variation (SNV). Clopidogrel carboxylic acid to clopidogrel area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 hours to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) ratio was 53% less in CES1 c.428G>A carriers than in noncarriers (P = 0.009), indicating impaired hydrolysis of clopidogrel. Consequently, the AUC0-∞ of clopidogrel and its active metabolite were 123% (P = 0.004) and 67% (P = 0.009) larger in the c.428G>A carriers than in noncarriers. Consistent with these findings, the average inhibition of P2Y12 -mediated platelet aggregation 0-12 hours after clopidogrel intake was 19 percentage points higher in the c.428G>A carriers than in noncarriers (P = 0.036). In conclusion, the CES1 c.428G>A SNV increases clopidogrel active metabolite concentrations and antiplatelet effects by reducing clopidogrel hydrolysis to inactive metabolites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarkiainen et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: