Key result
Monogenic FH variants convey a 3-10 fold risk of early-onset ASCVD, while polygenic risk scores in the top 8% convey an approximately 3-fold risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited lipid disorder affecting 1 in 220 individuals resulting in highly elevated low-density lipoprotein levels and risk of premature coronary disease. Pathogenic variants causing FH typically involve the LDL receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B-100 (APOB), and proprotein convertase subtulisin/kexin type 9 genes (PCSK9) and if identified convey a risk of early onset coronary artery disease (ASCVD) of 3-10 fold versus the general population depending on the severity of the mutation. Identification of monogenic FH within a family has implications for family-based testing (cascade screening), risk stratification, and potentially management, and it has now been recommended that such testing be offered to all potential FH patients. Recently, robust genome wide association studies (GWAS) have led to the recognition that the accumulation of common, small effect alleles affecting many LDL-c raising genes can result in a clinical phenotype largely indistinguishable from monogenic FH (i.e a risk of early onset ASCVD of ~ 3 fold) in those at the extreme tail of the distribution for these alleles (i.e. the top 8% of the population for a polygenic risk score). The incorporation of these genetic risk scores into clinical practice for non-FH patients may improve risk stratification but is not yet widely performed due to a less robust evidence base for utility. Here, we review the current status of FH genetic testing, potential future applications as well as challenges and pitfalls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarraju et al. (2019) conducted a review in Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Genetic testing and polygenic risk scores was evaluated. Monogenic FH variants convey a 3-10 fold risk of early-onset ASCVD, while polygenic risk scores in the top 8% convey an approximately 3-fold risk.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: