Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: In multiple sclerosis (MS), contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) in T1-weighted postcontrast MRI are considered markers of blood-brain barrier breakdown. It remains unknown if re-enhancement can be considered a radiologic indicator of different pathology in CELs. We investigated 1) the incidence of re-enhancing lesions (re-CELs) from chronic lesions; 2) differences in size, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and likelihood to appear as acute black holes (aBHs) between new lesions (n-CELs) and re-CELs; and 3) associations between re-CELs and features indicating more advanced disease. METHODS: In this retrospective natural history study, we examined 264 monthly MRI scans performed at month 1 (M1), month 2 (M2), and month 3 (M3) for 88 patients with MS. CELs were defined as n-CELs if not present in the M1 T2W MRI and re-CELs if present in the M1 T2W MRI. RESULTS: A total of 311 (82.7%) n-CELs and 65 (17.3%) re-CELs were identified. Of the 88 patients, 54 presented only n-CELs, 8 presented only re-CELs, and 26 presented both CEL types. Patients with both lesion types presented more CELs than those presenting only one type (p = 0.01). Re-CELs were larger (z = 2.72, p = 0.007) and had lower MTR (z = -2.80, p = 0.005) than n-CELs but the estimated proportion of aBHs from n-CELs was similar (z = -0.09, p = 0.1) from the proportion of aBHs from re-CELs. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 20% of CELs represent the reoccurrence of enhancement in chronic plaques. Re-CELs represent larger areas of inflammation, not necessarily associated with larger areas of edema.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: