Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
M-CAT motifs mediate muscle-specific transcriptional activity via interaction with binding factors that are antigenically and biochemically related to vertebrate transcription enhancer factor-1 (TEF-1), a member of the TEA/ATTS domain family of transcription factors. M-CAT binding activities present in cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues cannot be fully accounted for by existing cloned isoforms of TEF-1. TEF-1-related cDNAs isolated from heart libraries indicate that at least three classes of TEF-1-related cDNAs are expressed in these and other tissues. One class are homologues of the human TEF-1 originally cloned from HeLa cells (Xiao, J. H., Davidson, I., Matthes, H., Garnier, J. M., and Chambon, P. (1991) Cell 65, 551-568). A second class represents homologues of the avian TEF-1-related gene previously isolated (Stewart, A. F., Larkin, S. B., Farrance, I. K., Mar, J. H., Hall, D. E., and Ordahl, C. P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3147-3150). The third class consists of a novel, divergent TEF-1 cDNA, named DTEF-1, and its preliminary characterization is described here. Two isoforms of DTEF-1 (DTEF-1A and DTEF-1B) were isolated as 1.9-kilobase pair clones with putative open reading frames of 433 and 432 amino acids whose differences are attributable to alternative splicing at the C terminus of the TEA DNA binding domain. Cardiac muscle contains high levels of DTEF-1 transcripts, but unexpectedly low levels are detected in skeletal muscle. DTEF-1 transcripts are present at intermediate levels in gizzard and lung, and at low levels in kidney. DTEF-1A is a sequence-specific M-CAT-binding factor. The distinct spatial pattern of expression, and unusual amino acid sequence in its DNA binding domain, may indicate a particular role for DTEF-1 in cell-specific gene regulation. Recent work also suggests that at least one more TEF-1-related gene exists in vertebrates. We propose a naming system for the four TEF-1 gene family members identified to date that preserves existing nomenclature and provides a means for extending that nomenclature as additional family members may be identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azakie et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: