Why the study?
Does ischemic postconditioning improve complete ST-segment resolution in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction?
Does ischemic postconditioning improve complete ST-segment resolution in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction?
Ischemic postconditioning during primary PCI for STEMI does not improve myocardial reperfusion or clinical outcomes at 30 days compared to conventional PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ischemic postconditioning adds no reperfusion benefit during primary PCI for STEMI; challenges prior smaller trials and supports conventional PCI alone.
BACKGROUND: Ischemic postconditioning has been reported to reduce infarct size in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. However, cardioprotective effects of postconditioning have not been demonstrated in a large-scale trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial. A total of 700 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomly assigned to the postconditioning group or to the conventional primary PCI group in a 1:1 ratio. Postconditioning was performed immediately after restoration of coronary flow as follows: The angioplasty balloon was positioned at the culprit lesion and inflated 4 times for 1 minute with low-pressure (<6 atm) inflations, each separated by 1 minute of deflation. The primary end point was complete ST-segment resolution (percentage resolution of ST-segment elevation >70%) measured at 30 minutes after PCI. Complete ST-segment resolution occurred in 40.5% of patients in the postconditioning group and 41.5% of patients in the conventional PCI group (absolute difference, -1.0%; 95% confidence interval, -8.4 to 6.4; P=0.79). The rate of myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1 and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis) at 30 days did not differ significantly between the postconditioning group and the conventional PCI group (17.2% versus 22.4% [P=0.20] and 4.3% versus 3.7% [P=0.70], respectively). CONCLUSION: Ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with current standard practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hahn et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: