Why the study?
Does sympathetic stimulation (exercise, isoproterenol) or atrial pacing differentially affect the QTc interval in patients with congenital long QT syndrome compared to controls?
Does sympathetic stimulation (exercise, isoproterenol) or atrial pacing differentially affect the QTc interval in patients with congenital long QT syndrome compared to controls?
Sympathetic stimulation via exercise or isoproterenol, but not atrial pacing, significantly prolongs the QTc interval and alters TU wave morphology in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sympathetic stimulation may prolong QTc in congenital LQT unlike rate alone; supports mechanism-specific insights but leaves open clinical implications.
Sympathetic stimulation is well known to contribute to the genesis of QTU prolongation and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. In this study, we performed exercise treadmill testing, isoproterenol infusion (1-2 micrograms/min), and right atrial pacing (cycle length 500 msec) in 11 patients with congenital long QT (LQT) syndrome (LQT group) and in 12 age- and sex-matched controls (control group). The responses of the corrected QT (QTc; Bazett's method) interval and the TU wave complex were evaluated. The QTc interval was prolonged from 482 +/- 63 msec1/2 to 548 +/- 28 msec1/2 by exercise in the LQT group (n = 11; P less than 0.005), and this was associated with fusion of the T waves with enlarged U waves, whereas the QTc interval did not increase with exercise in the control group (n = 12; 402 +/- 19 msec1/2 vs 409 +/- 22 msec1/2). The QTc interval was also prolonged from 466 +/- 50 msec1/2 to 556 +/- 33 msec1/2 by isoproterenol in the LQT group (n = 7; P less than 0.005) in association with morphological changes of the TU wave complex like those seen with exercise, whereas it was only slightly increased from 399 +/- 10 msec1/2 to 436 +/- 13 msec1/2 by isoproterenol in the control group (n = 77; P less than 0.001). However, the QTc interval did not increase with atrial pacing in the LQT group (n = 8; 476 +/- 57 msec1/2 vs 486 +/- 59 msec1/2), whereas it was slightly increased from 400 +/- 21 msec1/2 to 426 +/- 18 msec1/2 by atrial pacing in the control group (n = 8; P less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: