Why the study?
Do sympathetic stimulations (exercise, face immersion, isoproterenol) alter the QTc interval differently in children with LQTS compared to healthy controls?
Do sympathetic stimulations (exercise, face immersion, isoproterenol) alter the QTc interval differently in children with LQTS compared to healthy controls?
Sympathetic stimulations such as face immersion and exercise testing significantly amplify QTc prolongation in children with LQTS, suggesting these methods may be useful for diagnosing borderline cases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sympathetic maneuvers may aid borderline LQTS diagnosis in children; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
The present study was performed to observe the change of QT interval by sympathetic stimulations in patients with the long Qt syndrome (LQTS). The study group consisted of 6 children with LQTS and 6 healthy children without QT prolongation. All LQTS patients had syncopal episodes. The QTc and delta QTc% ([QTc interval after examination-QTc interval at rest]/ QTc interval at rest x 100) by treadmill testing, face immersion, and isoproterenol were examined. One minute after peak exercise of treadmill testing, the changes in the QTc interval were not significant in either group, but delta QTc% was larger in the LQTS group than in the control group (+ 11.0 +/- 12.1% vs -2.6 +/- 3.2%; P = 0.02). The QTc interval at the shortest RR interval during face immersion was prolonged in the LQTS group (0.47 +/- 0.01 s to 0.51 +/- 0.04 s; P = 0.02), but there were no significant changes in the control group (0.40 +/- 0.03 s to 0.41 +/- 0.03 s; P = NS). delta QTc% was larger in the LQTS group than in the control group (+ 10.0 +/- 7.3% vs +1.1 +/- 5.5%; P = 0.04). In the LQTS group, the RR interval was shortened (P = 0.009) and QTc interval was prolonged (P = 0.0008) after isoproterenol infusion. These sympathetic stimulations amplified the TU abnormality in the LQTS group. By observing the TU changes caused by face immersion, we hoped to find a possible new method with which to diagnose LQTS. The combination of these examinations may be helpful in screening the borderline cases of TU abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katagiri‐Kawade et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: