Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thymidylate synthetase of pig thymus has been separated into two principal forms (designated I and II, based on their order of elution) by chromatography on CM-Sephadex. By the use of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 the synthetase activity was separated into two fractions, and these were further purified by gel filtration using Sephadex G-100 and chromatography on CM-Sephadex. The highest specific activity obtained for I and II was 10.4 and 16.3 μmol of thymidine-5′-phosphate per hour per milligram of protein at 25° and pH 7.3 which represents a purification of 1680- and 2630-fold, respectively. Electrophoretically, I and II appear to be 70–80% pure. The Michaelis constants of 7.4 × 10 −6 M, 1.7 × 10 −5 M, and 1.8 × 10 −4 M for II with respect to deoxyuridine-5′-phosphate, 5,10-methlenetetrahydrofolate, and uridine-5′-phosphate, respectively, have been determined. A double pH optima in the range of 6.6–6.8 and 7.2–7.4 in 2-N-morpholinoethane sulfonic acid buffer was exhibited by both forms. Forms I and II showed maximal catalytic activity only in the presence of sulfhydryl compounds (60 mM) and also had the ability to methylate uridine-5′-phosphate, although at a slower rate (ca. 28% and 13%, respectively) compared with the rate of methylation of deoxyuridine-5′-phosphate. Both deoxyuridine-5′-phosphate and tetrahydrofolate (to a lesser extent) afforded protection to II against heat inactivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: