Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative optical measurements of deep subwavelength, three-dimensional (3D), nanometric structures with sensitivity to sub-nanometer details address a ubiquitous measurement challenge. A Fourier domain normalization approach is used in the Fourier optical imaging code to simulate the full 3D scattered light field of nominally 15 nm-sized structures, accurately replicating the light field as a function of the focus position. Using the full 3D light field, nanometer scale details such as a 2 nm thin conformal oxide and nanometer topography are rigorously fitted for features less than one-thirtieth of the wavelength in size. The densely packed structures are positioned nearly an order of magnitude closer than the conventional Rayleigh resolution limit and can be measured with sub-nanometer parametric uncertainties. This approach enables a practical measurement sensitivity to size variations of only a few atoms in size using a high-throughput optical configuration with broad application in measuring nanometric structures and nanoelectronic devices. Optical scatterfield microscopy combined with Fourier domain analysis permits image reconstruction of features on a deep-subwavelength scale. Scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the USA report that their imaging scheme can map features on a scale of just 15 nm when using a blue light-emitting diode, which corresponds to one-thirtieth of the illumination wavelength (450 nm). The approach involves focusing polarized blue light onto a target object and imaging at multiple focus positions using a charge-coupled device camera to capture the scattered field. Fourier domain analysis and a model based on nonlinear regression are used to fit the experimental data to a library of simulations. The researchers verified their approach using 30- and 100-line targets, which had been fabricated by electron-beam lithography with linewidths of 14, 16 and 18 nm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: