Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Emergency contraception in the past two decades had been proven to be effective and well tolerated. Counseling and advance provision and prescription of emergency contraception have been embraced by professional organizations in practice guidelines for its potential to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions. Has emergency contraception lived up to that promise? RECENT FINDINGS: Mifepristone (not available in the USA) is the agent of choice. Emergency contraception has not reduced the number of unintended pregnancies. Acceptance by healthcare providers and the public has not been optimal, and multiple financial and healthcare system barriers to use emergency contraception continue to exist. The public health impact of emergency contraception has been disappointing. SUMMARY: Although emergency contraception may continue to be an important component of contraceptive practice, only increased access to more effective methods of contraception will change unintended pregnancy rates. The use of mifepristone for emergency contraception in the USA must be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fredrik F. Broekhuizen (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: