Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rabbit skeletal muscle F-actin has been selectively labeled at a cysteine residue with the environmentally sensitive fluorophore 6-acryloyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene. The fluorescent actin conjugate behaves similarly to native actin with respect to the polymerization kinetics, critical monomer concentration, and ability to form F-actin paracrystals. Upon polymerization to F-actin, the absorption of the actin conjugate is red-shifted, whereas the fluorescence emission is blue-shifted 740 wavenumbers and is accompanied by a decrease in the fluorescence bandwidth of 470 wavenumbers. These large shifts in the spectral properties of 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene (Prodan) in actin provide a simple method for obtaining a spectral discrimination between the G- and F-actin populations during the polymerization reaction. Steady-state fluorescence techniques were used to study the environment of the fluorophore in the monomeric and polymeric forms of actin. Fluorescence emission spectral analysis and quenching and polarization studies of G-actin-Prodan indicated that the fluorophore lies immobile on the protein surface but with one of its faces in full contact with the solvent. In F-actin, the fluorophore has a limited exposure to the solvent and is located in a dielectric environment similar to those seen for Prodan in polar, aprotic solvents or buried within a protein matrix [Macgregor, R. B., Jr., & Weber, G. (1986) Nature (London) 318, 70-73]. Additionally, our results demonstrate that the Prodan molecule conjugated to F-actin is completely immobile during its fluorescence lifetime, exhibits an increase in the resonance energy transfer (RET) from tryptophan residues compared to that observed in G-actin, and shows evidence of homologous RET within the polymer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marriott et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: