Why the study?
Doxorubicin can cause life-threatening renal damage, and there has been no effective treatment for this toxicity.
Does nano-resveratrol, native resveratrol, or their combination with carvedilol prevent doxorubicin-induced renal toxicity in rats?
Does nano-resveratrol, native resveratrol, or their combination with carvedilol prevent doxorubicin-induced renal toxicity in rats?
Nano-resveratrol demonstrated superior efficacy compared to native resveratrol in mitigating doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity in a rat model.
N-Resv plus carvedilol may attenuate DXR renal injury in rats; leaves open clinical translation pending human trials.
Background: Although doxorubicin (DXR) is one of the most used anticancer drugs, it can cause life-threatening renal damage. There has been no effective treatment for DXR-induced renal damage until now. Aim: This work aims at examining the potential impact of nano-resveratrol (N-Resv), native resveratrol (Resv), and their combination with carvedilol (Card) against DXR-induced renal toxicity in rats and to investigate the mechanisms through which these antioxidants act to ameliorate DXR nephrotoxicity. Method: DXR was administered to rats (2 mg/kg, i.p.) twice weekly over 5 weeks. The antioxidants in question were taken 1 week before the DXR dose for 6 weeks. Results: DXR exhibited an elevation in serum urea, creatinine, renal lipid peroxide levels, endoglin expression, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and beclin-1. On the other hand, renal podocin and mTOR expression and GSH levels were declined. In addition, DNA fragmentation was markedly increased in the DXR-administered group. Treatment with either Resv or N-Resv alone or in combination with Card ameliorated the previously measured parameters. Conclusion: N-Resv showed superior effectiveness relative to Resv in most of the measured parameters. Histopathological examination revealed amelioration of renal structural and cellular changes after DXR by Card and N-Resv, thus validating the previous biochemical and molecular results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alhusaini et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: