Why the study?
Does a direct ELISA for big endothelin-1 correlate with an extraction-based ELISA and with indicators of left ventricular dysfunction?
Does a direct ELISA for big endothelin-1 correlate with an extraction-based ELISA and with indicators of left ventricular dysfunction?
Plasma big endothelin-1 concentrations measured by a direct ELISA correlate closely with an extraction-based assay and with hemodynamic indicators of left ventricular dysfunction.
May support direct ELISA as simpler alternative in research; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use in LV dysfunction.
Recent studies have suggested that the plasma concentrations of endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictive peptide, are increased in patients with congestive heart failure. This study aimed to evaluate a new direct ELISA for big endothelin-1 (the precursor of endothelin-1), in comparison with a big endothelin-1 ELISA using plasma sample extraction, and to investigate whether plasma big endothelin-1 concentrations correlate with indicators of left ventricular function. The direct ELISA yielded significantly (P < 0.001) lower results than the assay with extracted samples (0.9 +/- 0.5 pmol/L vs 2.7 +/- 1.9 pmol/L; n = 90); however, the results of the two assays were closely correlated (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). Plasma big endothelin-1 concentrations exhibited a significant (P < 0.001) negative correlation (r = -0.46, r = -0.40) with the left ventricular ejection fraction and a significant positive correlation (r = 0.40, P < 0.001; r = 0.36, P < 0.01) with the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and the left ventricular end-diastolic (r = 0.42, r = 0.38, P < 0.001) and end-systolic (r = 0.52, r = 0.47, P < 0.001) volume indices. Plasma big endothelin-1 concentrations were notably greater in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV symptoms than in patients without cardiac disease or in patients categorized to NYHA class I. These data suggest that plasma big endothelin-1 concentrations, measured by a direct ELISA, correlate with hemodynamic indicators and symptoms of left ventricular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haug et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: