Why the study?
Does oral ivabradine improve heart rate reduction compared to oral metoprolol in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography?
Does oral ivabradine improve heart rate reduction compared to oral metoprolol in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography?
Oral ivabradine provides superior heart rate reduction compared to metoprolol without lowering blood pressure in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography.
May support ivabradine over metoprolol for pre-CTCA heart rate control; confirms superiority in this RCT.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of oral ivabradine as a heart rate reducing agent in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography (CTCA). Despite the routine use of β-blockers prior to CTCA studies, it is not uncommon to have patients with heart rates persistently above the target range of 65 bpm. Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of the I(f) current, which primarily contributes to sinus node pacemaker activity, and has no significant direct cardiovascular effects such as reduction of blood pressure, cardiac contractility or impairment of cardiac conduction. METHODS: We investigated 100 consecutive patients who had been referred for CTCA for the evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were randomised to receive either of the following two pre-medication protocols: oral metorprolol or oral ivabradine. RESULTS: Ivabradine was significantly more effective than metorprolol in lowering the heart rate; the mean percentage reduction in heart rate with ivabradine vs metorpolol was 23.89+6.95% vs 15.20+4.50%, respectively (p=0.0001). Metoprolol significantly lowered both systolic and diastolic blood pressure while ivabradine did not. The requirement of additional doses to achieve a target heart rate of <65 beats per min was also significantly more frequent with metoprolol. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine is a potentially attractive alternative to currently used drugs for reduction of heart rate in patients undergoing CTCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adile et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: