Why the study?
Does an automated active contour model approach accurately measure carotid intima media thickness compared to manual measurement in ultrasound images?
Does an automated active contour model approach accurately measure carotid intima media thickness compared to manual measurement in ultrasound images?
The proposed automated active contour model accurately segments the common carotid artery and measures intima-media thickness, reducing subjectivity and operator variability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid automated CIMT research; leaves open clinical validation before any practice consideration.
In this paper, we have proposed an automated approach to segment common carotid artery from longitudinal carotid B-mode ultrasound images and calculate the carotid intima media thickness. The proposed approach extracts the contours in the ultrasound images using gradient vector flow snakes with an improved snake initialization process. The seed points for this improved snake initialization process are extracted using selected edges returned by the candidate line-selection algorithm. Intima media thickness is calculated from the extracted contours. The proposed approach is tested and clinically validated on a data set of 100 longitudinal ultrasound images of the carotid artery. There is no significant difference between intima media thickness measurements obtained using the proposed approach and the manual measurements. The intra-observer error of 0.088, a coefficient of variation of 12.99 %, Bland–Altman plots with small differences between experts (0.01 and 0.03 for Expert1 and Expert2, respectively) and figure of merit of 98.5 % are obtained. The proposed approach can be used successfully for carotid intima media thickness measurement, which can further be used for risk estimation of cardiovascular diseases and ischemic stroke. The proposed approach makes the segmentation process automated and yet reduces the risk of subjectivity and operator variability for intima media thickness measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tauseef et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: