This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study explores the use of spark erosion machining for the manufacturing of circular profiles in ceramic composites composed of silicon nitride and titanium nitride (Si3N4–TiN). To address measuring criteria such as material removal rate, electrode wear rate, surface roughness, radial over cut, and geometric tolerances, four crucial machining factors have been taken into account: current, spark-on time, spark-off time, and dielectric pressure. Employing multi-criteria methods for making decisions such as technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and grey relational analysis (GRA), the optimal combination of machining configurations can be identified to optimize the efficiency of all replies. In conjunction with GRA, the teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) method—a metaheuristic or algorithm inspired by nature—determines the global ideal parameters. The magnitude of responses such as geometric tolerances, pulse-on time, and material removal rate is significantly affected by dielectric pressure, pulse-on time, and current. Two of the most crucial factors are the current and the pulse-on time, according to most respondents. The GRA and TOPSIS methodologies determined that a current of 3 A, a pulse-on duration of 5 μs, a pulse-off time of 10 μs, and a dielectric pressure of 15 kg/cm2 would get the best responses for Electrical Discharge Machining (EDMed). The best combination of process variables obtained from TLBO optimization is a current of 2.88 A, a pulse-on duration of 2.78 μs, a pulse-off time of 4 μs, and a dielectric pressure of 8.56 kg/cm2.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selvarajan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: