Why the study?
Does antiplatelet therapy reduce vascular events in patients with atherosclerotic disease?
Does antiplatelet therapy reduce vascular events in patients with atherosclerotic disease?
This review highlights the critical role of antiplatelet therapy, particularly aspirin and clopidogrel, in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events.
Supports antiplatelet use in atherosclerosis; leaves open optimal agent selection pending updated RCTs.
The role of the platelet and the endothelium in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and subsequent ischemic events has been the subject of extensive investigation. Arterial sites where endothelial function is severely impaired are often the sites of atheroma development. Lesion evolution impairs endothelial function, leading to a self-perpetuating cycle of growth. During early lesion development, overt thrombotic events are rare. However, rupture of an advanced, necrotic plaque or intimal ulceration triggers arterial thrombosis, at which point the importance of platelet function may be seen clearly. The Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis demonstrated the benefit of antiplatelet therapy to patients with atherosclerotic disease. Aspirin is the most widely studied agent and is considered the standard of antiplatelet therapy. Newer agents that intervene at different stages of the platelet activation pathway have been developed. Clopidogrel, a new adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, is more effective than aspirin in reducing vascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or established peripheral arterial disease. The glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists such as abciximab have proven effective in the setting of active arterial thrombosis and percutaneous revascularization, but their value in secondary prevention remains unknown. All patients with atherosclerosis should be treated with an antiplatelet drug. Current evidence suggests that either aspirin or clopidogrel are appropriate first-line agents. There is urgent need for an analysis of the risk/benefit ratio in various populations and clinical settings to determine the most appropriate type and intensity of therapy for a given patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: