Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While the Lisbon Treaty has been heralded as victory for the E uropean Parliament, the crisis‐related reforms of the E uropean Union's economic governance regime are commonly being considered to have empowered governments and supranational institutions – such as the Commission and ECB – at the expense of the EP and national parliaments. This article argues that the picture is more nuanced than suggested by the conventional wisdom: legitimacy‐seeking and interinstitutional bargaining arguments, which have been applied effectively to account for the expansion of the EP's power in the past, highlight the conditions under which the EP 's struggle for more institutional power is either met with success (as in the case of the single supervisory mechanism) or faces virtually insurmountable obstacles (as in the case of the Troika and the E uropean Stability Mechanism).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berthold Rittberger (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: