Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The accurate assessment of FSH concentration is important for evaluating ovarian function prior to IVF. However, a number of different assay techniques are currently in use, leading to inconsistencies in the hormone data being reported. To address this problem, we measured FSH concentration using a number of commercially available systems. METHODS: Day 3 serum FSH levels were measured in 215 healthy fertile women using six different immunoassays: Coatria (125)I (Bio-Mérieux), ACS-180 (Bayer Diagnostics), Advia-Centaur (Bayer Diagnostics), Vitros ECi (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics), Architect i2000 (Abbott) and Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics). RESULTS: According to the immunoassay, means +/- SD of FSH concentrations were: 6.5 +/- 2.2 mIU/ml for Coatria (125)I, 6.8 +/- 2.7 mIU/ml for Advia-Centaur, 6.7 +/- 3.0 mIU/ml for Vitros ECi, 7.6 +/- 3.0 mIU/ml for ACS-180, 8.2 +/- 3.3 mIU/ml for Architect i2000 and 8.8 +/- 3.0 mIU/ml for Elecsys 2010. CONCLUSION: Day 3 FSH values determined by six different immunoassays were significantly different (P < 0.01, paired t-test). Physicians must take care when interpreting results from different clinical laboratories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julien Taı̈eb (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: