Randomized trial shows higher long-term knowledge retention in undergraduate stroke education through virtual simulation, suggesting its value over traditional methods.
Background Virtual simulation is increasingly used in undergraduate medical education, but its value for long-term retention in stroke teaching remains unclear. This trial compared virtual simulation-based teaching with conventional bedside teaching in undergraduate stroke education. Methods This was a single-center, prospective, parallel-group, randomized educational trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Fourth-year undergraduate medical students were assigned to a simulation group or a conventional group. Both groups received the same didactic teaching followed by practical training in different formats with equal teaching hours. Outcomes were assessed 1 day before the module, 1 day after the module, and 10 months later. The primary outcome was the 10-months follow-up assessment score. Secondary outcomes included the post-course assessment score, decay score, and score trajectories over time. Results A total of 110 students were randomized, with 55 assigned to each group; 107 were included in the final longitudinal analysis. At the 10-months follow-up, assessment scores were higher in the simulation group than in the conventional group (median [IQR], 81.0 [77.0–85.5] vs. 74.5 [71.0–78.0]). After adjustment for pre-course assessment score and prior academic performance, the simulation group remained associated with higher follow-up scores (adjusted mean, 81.18 vs. 74.81; adjusted mean difference, 6.37 points; 95% CI, 4.83–7.91; P < 0.001). The primary result remained stable after additional adjustment for self-reported re-exposure during follow-up (adjusted mean difference, 5.92 points; 95% CI, 4.35–7.49; P < 0.001). Post-course scores were also higher and decay scores were lower in the simulation group. No adverse or unintended events were identified. Conclusion Virtual simulation-based teaching was associated with higher immediate post-course scores and better long-term retention in undergraduate stroke education, supporting its use as a valuable adjunct to conventional bedside teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: