Why the study?
Active cancer is associated with increased cardiovascular and bleeding risks in AMI, but whether these risks still exist in AMI patients with inactive cancer remains unknown.
Does inactive cancer increase the risk of cardiovascular and bleeding events in AMI patients receiving primary PCI with drug-eluting stents?
Does inactive cancer increase the risk of cardiovascular and bleeding events in AMI patients receiving primary PCI with drug-eluting stents?
Inactive cancer may identify higher-risk post-PCI AMI patients; leaves open optimal antithrombotic strategies pending prospective trials.
Background: Active cancer associates with increased cardiovascular and bleeding risks in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Recent chemotherapeutic agents have improved survival rate which enables to induce inactive status of cancer. However, whether cardiovascular and bleeding risks still exist in AMI patients with inactive cancer remains unknown. Methods: The current study is a retrospective cross-sectional study including 712 AMI patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent between 2007 and 2017. Primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction subjects was defined as PCI performed within 48 and 72 hours of symptom onset, respectively. Cardiovascular (= all-cause death + non-fatal MI + stroke) and bleeding events were compared in AMI patients with and without inactive cancer. Results: Inactive cancer was identified in 11.1% of study subjects. Patients with inactive cancer were older (P<0.001) with atrial fibrillation (P<0.001), chronic kidney disease (P<0.001), anemia (P<0.001) and a higher prevalence of Killip class IV (P<0.001). Dual (82.3% vs. 86.7%) and triple (17.7% vs. 13.3%, P=0.34) antithrombotic therapies were commenced. Nearly 80% of subjects switched to single antithrombotic therapy around 1.5 years after dual/triple antithrombotic therapies (77.2% vs. 77.3%, P=0.994). During the 2.9-year observational period, inactive cancer was associated with 3.59-fold elevated risk for experiencing a composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events (95% CI: 2.13–6.04, P<0.001). Furthermore, after adjusting clinical characteristics, inactive cancer was an independent predictor for bleeding events (HR: 3.98, 95% CI: 1.90–8.34, P<0.001). Of particular interests, even after switching to single antithrombotic therapy, an elevated bleeding risk was still observed in inactive cancer subjects (P<0.001). Conclusions: Inactive cancer worsened clinical outcome, especially bleeding risks in AMI subjects, underscoring to further optimize their antithrombotic managements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: