Key result
Active cancer in patients with STEMI was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding at 1 year (SHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.30-1.71) but a similar risk of re-infarction compared to no cancer.
Why the study?
Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with STEMI is complex due to an increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications.
Does active cancer increase the risk of major bleeding and re-infarction in patients presenting with STEMI?
Cohort (n=322,776)
Yes
Does active cancer increase the risk of major bleeding and re-infarction in patients presenting with STEMI?
In patients presenting with STEMI, active cancer is associated with a 50% increased risk of major bleeding at 1 year but no significant increase in re-infarction risk, highlighting the need for tailored bleeding mitigation strategies.
May warrant bleeding mitigation focus in STEMI with cancer; hypothesis-generating for tailored antithrombotic trials.
Aims Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complex given the increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications. Methods and results A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 was obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project and the UK National Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcomes were major bleeding and re-infarction at 1 year following admission with STEMI. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding events that require hospital admission. Re-infarction was defined as acute MI according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. A total of 322 776 STEMI-indexed admissions were identified between January 2005 and March 2019. Of those, 7050 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Cancer patients received invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs. 72.7%, P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.001) less often compared with patients without cancer and were less likely to be prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (85% vs. 95.4%, P < 0.001). The incidence of major bleeding (6.5% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001) and re-infarction (cancer 5.7%, no cancer 5.1%, P = 0.01) was higher in cancer patients at 1 year. After adjustment for differences in baseline covariates, a similar risk of re-infarction (sub-hazard ratios (SHR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.94–1.27) and a 50% increased risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30–1.71) were observed in cancer patients. Conclusion Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients have a higher risk of major bleeding but not of re-infarction. Mitigating bleeding risk in STEMI patients with cancer is of paramount importance to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dafaalla et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=322,776). Active cancer vs. No cancer was evaluated on Major bleeding at 1 year (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71, p=<0.001). Active cancer in patients with STEMI was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding at 1 year (SHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.30-1.71) but a similar risk of re-infarction compared to no cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: