Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between QS subject rankings and the performance of top 2% scientists in the top 20 dental schools. METHODS: On 28 October, 2024, data sets released by the "QS World University Rankings by Subject 2024: Dentistry" and by Stanford University about the top 2% of scientists in academia (Version 7, published in 2024) were downloaded from their official websites. The top 2% of scientists who mainly published in dentistry and were affiliated with the top 20 dental schools were identified. From 28 October to 8 November, 2024, the official websites of the top 20 dental schools were visited to manually extract their faculty staff information. RESULTS: There were a total of 363 top 2% scientists affiliated with these schools according to the Stanford database. Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) had the highest total number of top 2% scientists (n = 32), but only 12 (37.5%) are current faculty staff. Meanwhile, Sichuan University has the highest number of top 2% scientists who are current faculty staff (n = 24, 100%). On average, the ratio of current faculty staff being top 2% scientists was 12.4%, and that of academic staff was 19.9%. The University of Hong Kong had the highest QS ranked dental school with above-average numbers in these two aspects. The number of top 2% scientists from these 20 dental schools positively correlated to their QS H-index score in 3 out of the last 5 years. Some limitations of the analysis include that faculty staff information was manually determined, and that some scientists had duplicate entries or inaccurate affiliation information in the database. CONCLUSION: The number of top 2% scientists of the top 20 dental schools positively correlated to their overall QS score and QS H-index score. The QS academic reputation score would be higher if the active top 2% scientists had more equal performance in terms of total citations received and overall composite score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: