Key result
Increased post-revascularization secondary prevention for PAD is linked to ~27% lower 1-year MACE.
Cohort (n=32,911)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study reveals improved cardiovascular outcomes alongside rising secondary prevention after peripheral arterial revascularization, suggesting benefits from guideline-directed therapy.
BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Medical prevention with antithrombotic and statin therapies is a mainstay of treatment to prevent adverse outcomes; nevertheless, patients with PAD are often undertreated. This study describes the temporal changes in medical prevention and adverse outcomes in a national cohort of patients with symptomatic PAD after revascularization. METHODS: We identified all patients with a first open surgical or endovascular revascularization procedure in the lower extremities or abdomen in Denmark, from 2000 to 2016. We examined temporal changes in the use of aspirin, clopidogrel, and statins and 1-year cause-specific hazard ratios for adverse clinical outcomes, after adjusting for procedure type, treatment indication, age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. The analyses were performed overall and within strata of index procedure (endovascular versus surgical), treatment indication, age, sex, and high-risk comorbidities. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2016, we identified 32 911 patients who underwent revascularization for symptomatic PAD. The mean age was 69 years and increased over time, as did the burden of comorbidity. The cumulative incidence of medication use increased between 2000 to 2004 and 2013 to 2016, respectively, from 57.3% to 64.3% for aspirin, 3.6% to 24.8% for clopidogrel, and 36.2% to 77.1% for statins. Concurrently, the 1-year outcome rates declined. Compared with 2000 to 2004, the adjusted hazard ratios in 2013 to 2016 were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62-0.84) for major adverse cardiovascular events, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-1.00) for major adverse limb events, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48-0.74) for myocardial infarction, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.75-1.18) for ischemic stroke, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.75-1.12) for major bleeding, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.39-0.76) for cardiovascular death, and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88) for all-cause death. These improvements in prognosis were most prominent from 2000 to 2004 to 2005 to 2008 and occurred in all strata of index procedure, treatment indication, sex, age, and comorbidity. In contrast, the adjusted hazard ratio for major amputations was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.90-1.11) when comparing 2013 to 2016 to 2000 to 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Medical prevention of adverse events has increased considerably over time in patients who underwent revascularization for symptomatic PAD. This increase was accompanied by reductions in all adverse outcomes, except major amputations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Søgaard et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (n=32,911). Revascularization in 2013-2016 era (with increased use of aspirin, clopidogrel, and statins) vs. Revascularization in 2000-2004 era was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (1-year) (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.84). Secondary prevention after PAD revascularization increased from 2000-2004 to 2013-2016, accompanying lower 1-year MACE (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62-0.84) and mortality (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.88).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: