Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to estimate age from the electrocardiogram (AI-ECG age). The difference between AI-ECG age and chronological age (delta-age) is an independent predictor of mortality in the general population. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between delta-age and mortality among adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). METHODS: A previously validated neural network was used to analyze standard digital 12-lead ECGs in a cohort of ACHD (age >18 years) between 1992 and 2023. A single ECG from each patient, collected during the first visit to the ACHD clinic, was analyzed to compute the delta-age. The relationship between the delta-age and mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for influential clinical factors. RESULTS: Of 5,780 subjects tested (50% females), the mean chronological age was 39.1 ± 15.0 years. AI-ECG age was 52.3 ± 16.6 years. CHD complexity was classified as mild, moderate, and severe in 7.4%, 73.9%, and 18.7% of patients, respectively. Patients with severe CHD had the highest median delta-age of 15.8 (IQR: 3.5-31.2) years followed by moderate 11.5 (IQR: 3.5-21.3) years and simple 6.7 (IQR: 0.3-14.2) years. During a median follow-up of 6.4 years (IQR: 1.58-13.7 years), 839 (14.5%) patients died. After adjusting for chronologic age, CHD complexity, and other clinical variables, delta-age was associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.06 [1.03-1.09] per 5-year increment in delta-age, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Delta-age, the difference between AI-ECG and chronological age, is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in ACHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anjewierden et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: