This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Clinician-rated measures remain the gold standard in depression trials, but patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide essential insights into real-world experiences. This study compared PROs in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) receiving either accelerated H1-coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ACC-iTBS) or standard once-daily high-frequency H1-coil TMS (SOC-HF). METHODS: In this randomized, multisite trial, 104 adults with moderate-to-severe MDD were assigned to ACC-iTBS (five sessions/day for six days, 50min intersession-interval, 50 Hz triplets, 5 Hz bursts frequency, 2s on, 8s off, 1800 pulses/session) or SOC-HF (daily sessions for four weeks, 18 Hz, 2s on 20s off, 1980 pulses/session), each followed by continuation treatment through week 6. PROs included the daily Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS-D), Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale (CUXOS-D), and the Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). Outcomes assessed were response/remission rates, time to perceived improvement, and quality-of-life changes. RESULTS: Both protocols produced significant and comparable improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality-of-life. Week 6 CUDOS response/remission rates were 70.0%/57.5% (ACC-iTBS) and 75.6%/58.5% (SOC-HF); CUXOS rates were 70.0%/67.5% (ACC-iTBS) and 75.6%/69.0% (SOC-HF). Patients in the ACC-iTBS arm reported a shorter median time to CUDOS response (11 vs. 16 days, p = 0.0377). Anxiety improvements emerged early and were sustained across both groups. By week 6, severe quality-of-life impairment declined to 15-17%, compared with 85-100% at baseline. No significant between-group differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated TMS with the H1 coil provides patient-perceived benefits comparable to standard treatment while delivering faster relief of depressive symptoms. ACC-iTBS may represent a time-efficient, patient-centered alternative that improves accessibility and satisfaction for individuals with MDD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tendler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: