Why the study?
Does the INVS1 method accurately assess stroke volume variation compared to the PiCCO technique in mechanically ventilated ICU patients?
Does the INVS1 method accurately assess stroke volume variation compared to the PiCCO technique in mechanically ventilated ICU patients?
The novel INVS1 method using arterial blood pressure measurements provides a simple, minimally invasive, and accurate alternative to the PiCCO technique for assessing stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients.
INVS1 may support stroke volume monitoring in ventilated ICU patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
This paper proposes a novel, simple and minimally invasive method for stroke variation assessment using arterial blood pressure measurements. The blood pressure signal is reconstructed using a semi-classical signal method allowing the computation of a parameter, called the first invariant INVS1. We show that INVS1 is linearly related to stroke. To validate this approach, a statistical comparaison between INVS1 and volume measured with the PiCCO technique was performed during a 15-mn in 21 mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care. In 94% of whole recordings, a strong correlation was estimated by cross-correlation (mean coefficient=0.9) and linear regression (mean coefficient=0.89). the linear relation had been verified, a Bland-Altman test showed the very agreement between the two approaches and their interchangeability. For the 6%, INVS1 and the PiCCO stroke volume were not correlated at all, and discrepancy, interpreted with the help of mean pressure, heart rate and vascular resistances, was in favor of INVS1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laleg‐Kirati et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: