Why the study?
Does sodium nitroprusside infusion alter aortic mechanical properties as measured by combined pressure and transesophageal ultrasound monitoring in ICU patients?
Does sodium nitroprusside infusion alter aortic mechanical properties as measured by combined pressure and transesophageal ultrasound monitoring in ICU patients?
Combined pressure and transesophageal ultrasound monitoring can assess descending aortic mechanical properties in the ICU, but ascending aorta assessment remains technically challenging.
SNP infusion was associated with lower SVR and higher aortic compliance; leaves open effects on outcomes and ascending aorta assessment.
We studied whether combined pressure and transesophageal ultrasound monitoring is feasible in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting for global cardiovascular hemodynamic monitoring [systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and total arterial compliance (C(PPM))] and direct estimation of local ascending and descending aortic mechanical properties, i.e., distensibility and compliance coefficients (DC and CC). Pressure-area data were fitted to the arctangent Langewouters model, with aortic cross-sectional area obtained via automated border detection. Data were measured in 19 subjects at baseline, during infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), and after washout. SNP infusion lowered SVR from 1.15 +/- 0.40 to 0.80 +/- 0.32 mmHg.ml(-1).s (P < 0.05), whereas C(PPM) increased from 0.87 +/- 0.46 to 1.02 +/- 0.42 ml/mmHg (P < 0.05). DC and CC increased from 0.0018 +/- 0.0007 to 0.0025 +/- 0.0009 l/mmHg (P < 0.05) and from 0.0066 +/- 0.0028 to 0.0083 +/- 0.0026 cm2/mmHg (P < 0.05), respectively, at the descending, but not ascending, aorta. The Langewouters model fitted the descending aorta data reasonably well. Assessment of local mechanical properties of the human ascending aorta in a clinical setting by automated border detection remains technically challenging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heerman et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: