Key result
Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance estimates of regional aortic arch pulse wave velocity correlated strongly with local theoretical indices derived from the Bramwell-Hill model.
Why the study?
Are automated CMR-derived regional and local aortic stiffness indices consistent with the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model and standard tonometry in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=46)
Are automated CMR-derived regional and local aortic stiffness indices consistent with the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model and standard tonometry in healthy subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated CMR-derived regional and local aortic stiffness indices are robust and consistent with theoretical models and standard tonometry, supporting their use in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness is considered as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, and is increasingly used in clinical practice. This study aimed at evaluating the consistency of the automated estimation of regional and local aortic stiffness indices from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data. RESULTS: Forty-six healthy subjects underwent carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements (CF_PWV) by applanation tonometry and CMR with steady-state free-precession and phase contrast acquisitions at the level of the aortic arch. These data were used for the automated evaluation of the aortic arch pulse wave velocity (Arch_PWV), and the ascending aorta distensibility (AA_Distc, AA_Distb), which were estimated from ascending aorta strain (AA_Strain) combined with either carotid or brachial pulse pressure. The local ascending aorta pulse wave velocity AA_PWVc and AA_PWVb were estimated respectively from these carotid and brachial derived distensibility indices according to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model, and were compared with the Arch_PWV. In addition, a reproducibility analysis of AA_PWV measurement and its comparison with the standard CF_PWV was performed. Characterization according to the Bramwell-Hill equation resulted in good correlations between Arch_PWV and both local distensibility indices AA_Distc (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and AA_Distb (r = 0.60, p < 0.001); and between Arch_PWV and both theoretical local indices AA_PWVc (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and AA_PWVb (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Arch_PWV was well related to CF_PWV (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and its estimation was highly reproducible (inter-operator variability: 7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The present work confirmed the consistency and robustness of the regional index Arch_PWV and the local indices AA_Distc and AA_Distb according to the theoretical model, as well as to the well established measurement of CF_PWV, demonstrating the relevance of the regional and local CMR indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dogui et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=46). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) estimation of aortic stiffness vs. Applanation tonometry and theoretical Bramwell-Hill model was evaluated on Correlation between regional aortic arch pulse wave velocity (Arch_PWV) and local theoretical indices (AA_PWVc and AA_PWVb) (r = 0.78, p=<0.001). Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance estimates of regional aortic arch pulse wave velocity correlated strongly with local theoretical indices derived from the Bramwell-Hill model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: