Key result
4D flow CMR aortic pulse wave velocity estimation using a 3D strategy with wavelets transit time was highly reproducible and significantly correlated with carotid-femoral PWV (R=0.62, p<0.001).
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare different methods of aortic PWV estimation from 4D flow CMR regarding associations with age, Cf-PWV, BH-PWV, and LV mass-to-volume ratio, reproducibility, and temporal resolution robustness.
Which 4D flow CMR method for estimating aortic pulse wave velocity correlates best with established stiffness measures in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
No
Which 4D flow CMR method for estimating aortic pulse wave velocity correlates best with established stiffness measures in healthy subjects?
A 3D-like strategy using wavelets transit time from 4D flow CMR provides highly reproducible estimates of aortic pulse wave velocity that correlate well with established measures of arterial stiffness.
Supports 4D flow CMR aoPWV estimation in research; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV) is associated with increased mortality in aging and disease. Several studies have shown the accuracy of applanation tonometry carotid-femoral PWV (Cf-PWV) and the relevance of evaluating central aorta stiffness using 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to estimate PWV, and aortic distensibility-derived PWV through the theoretical Bramwell-Hill model (BH-PWV). Our aim was to compare various methods of aortic PWV (aoPWV) estimation from 4D flow CMR, in terms of associations with age, Cf-PWV, BH-PWV and left ventricular (LV) mass-to-volume ratio while evaluating inter-observer reproducibility and robustness to temporal resolution. METHODS: We studied 47 healthy subjects (49.5 ± 18 years) who underwent Cf-PWV and CMR including aortic 4D flow CMR as well as 2D cine SSFP for BH-PWV and LV mass-to-volume ratio estimation. The aorta was semi-automatically segmented from 4D flow data, and mean velocity waveforms were estimated in 25 planes perpendicular to the aortic centerline. 4D flow CMR aoPWV was calculated: using velocity curves at two locations, namely ascending aorta (AAo) and distal descending aorta (DAo) aorta (S1, 2D-like strategy), or using all velocity curves along the entire aortic centreline (3D-like strategies) with iterative transit time (TT) estimates (S2) or a plane fitting of velocity curves systolic upslope (S3). For S1 and S2, TT was calculated using three approaches: cross-correlation (TTc), wavelets (TTw) and Fourier transforms (TTf). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman biases (BA) were used to evaluate inter-observer reproducibility and effect of lower temporal resolution. RESULTS: 4D flow CMR aoPWV estimates were significantly (p < 0.05) correlated to the CMR-independent Cf-PWV, BH-PWV, age and LV mass-to-volume ratio, with the strongest correlations for the 3D-like strategy using wavelets TT (S2-TTw) (R = 0.62, 0.65, 0.77 and 0.52, respectively, all p < 0.001). S2-TTw was also highly reproducible (ICC = 0.99, BA = 0.09 m/s) and robust to lower temporal resolution (ICC = 0.97, BA = 0.15 m/s). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducible 4D flow CMR aoPWV estimates can be obtained using full 3D aortic coverage. Such 4D flow CMR stiffness measures were significantly associated with Cf-PWV, BH-PWV, age and LV mass-to-volume ratio, with a slight superiority of the 3D strategy using wavelets transit time (S2-TTw).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houriez—Gombaud-Saintonge et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=47). 4D flow CMR aortic pulse wave velocity estimation (3D strategy with wavelets transit time) vs. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Cf-PWV) was evaluated on Correlation with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Cf-PWV) (R = 0.62, p=<0.001). 4D flow CMR aortic pulse wave velocity estimation using a 3D strategy with wavelets transit time was highly reproducible and significantly correlated with carotid-femoral PWV (R=0.62, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: