Why the study?
Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts adverse cardiovascular events and can be assessed non-invasively by MRI, but requires automated methods for large population-based cohorts.
Does a fully automatic method accurately quantify aortic pulse wave velocity compared to manual analysis in subjects undergoing MRI?
Population
212 subjects from a multi-center heart-brain connection cohort
Comparison
Novel automatic method vs manual analysis for PWV quantification
Design
Retrospective multi-center cohort study
Authors
Loading...
MRI-based aortic PWV supports risk stratification in observational cohorts; leaves open prospective validation before routine clinical use.
Does a fully automatic method accurately quantify aortic pulse wave velocity compared to manual analysis in subjects undergoing MRI?
A fully automatic method for quantifying aortic pulse wave velocity from MRI scans shows very good agreement with manual analysis, offering a scalable solution for large population-based studies.
Shahzad et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: