Why the study?
Successful TAVR depends on precise preprocedural selection, intraprocedural multimodal imaging guidance, and postprocedural follow-up to prevent complications and evaluate prosthetic function.
Multimodality imaging, particularly 2D/3D echocardiography and fusion imaging, is essential for the safe and effective performance of TAVR across all stages of the procedure.
Multimodal imaging may enhance TAVR success in intermediate-risk patients; leaves open standardized protocols for prospective validation.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an emerging and a well-established procedure for high-risk and inoperable patients worldwide. Recent studies revealed furthermore that TAVR is equal or even superior to surgical valve replacement in intermediate risk patients. Therefore, a successful procedure is not only dependent on precise preprocedural patient selection but also on careful intraprocedural multimodal imaging guidance and adequate postprocedural follow-up. Up to date, 2D/3D transthoracic and/or transoesophageal echocardiography is an easy and goal-oriented tool for periprocedural TAVR-assessment regarding annulus measurements, cardiac function and concomitant valve diseases. Further procedural success is directly related to prevention of severe early and late complications. Thus, a careful intra- and postprocedural echocardiographic guidance is crucial to evaluate prosthetic function, position and its haemodynamic implication and changes in the integrity of the left ventricle during intra- and postprocedural management. We explored the role of echocardiography for pre-, intra- and postprocedural TAVR-assessment, illustrated by cases and possible algorithms, in a comprehensive literature review. Furthermore, we describe the role of fusion imaging, that is, real-time fusion of transoesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy (EchoNavigator Release System® I and II) during TAVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veulemans et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: