Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is not uncommon, in argumentation and in various professions, to diagnose a gap between theory and practice; and in the next step argue that they should be brought into line with each other. But what does this mean? I shall argue that some version of a gap is sound, as it leaves theory with a critical, independent role in relation to practice – something that an equilibrium view does not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tone Kvernbekk (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: