Data spaces provide governed ecosystems for sovereign data exchange among organizations. However, current implementations rely on static, accept-or-reject contract mechanisms that limit agreement flexibility and constrain ecosystem adoption through suboptimal or failed negotiations. This work presents an automated and bilateral negotiation framework for multi-issue contracts in data spaces, aligned with the Dataspace Protocol (DSP) and the Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) standards. The framework comprises a negotiation engine that implements iterative, time-dependent concession strategies, utility-based evaluation, and opponent modeling, together with a translator module that provides bidirectional mapping between ODRL policy constructs and the negotiation logic. The framework design is grounded in a practitioner needs assessment that identifies current negotiation gaps, confirms demand for automated support, and informs the selection of negotiation issues and the human-in-the-loop approval mechanism. The framework is integrated with the Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC) and validated in an urban data-sharing scenario. A systematic evaluation compares the framework against baseline strategies, analyzes the effect of concession pace on the efficiency-welfare tradeoff, and characterizes framework robustness across varying degrees of preference overlap between parties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovach et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: