This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Lumbar spinal disease causes disabilities in performing daily activities. Operative treatments are aimed at pain relief and rapid return to routine activity. Patient-based outcome measures are used to evaluate pathologies and therapeutic effects associated with lumbar spinal disease. However, it remains unknown how much such treatment improves the activity levels. The purpose of current study was to evaluate the changes in activity levels before and after lumbar spinal surgery using a wearable activity tracker and to compare the relationship between the results and the patient-based outcomes. Methods: Sixty patients who underwent lumbar surgery were studied. The physical activity of participants was objectively evaluated using a wearable Micro-Motion logger system (Actigraph). We measured the amount of activity before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery to evaluate postoperative changes. Additionally, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Visual analog scale were used to assess patient-based outcomes of pain and ADL-related scores and the corresponding relationships with the actual activity levels were evaluated. Results: The amount of actual activity decreased significantly 1 month after the surgery compared to that during the preoperative period, which then improved after 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant improvement 6 months after the surgery compared to that during the preoperative period (p < 0.05). Moreover, the change in activity amount for each period was strongly correlated, regardless of the period. In contrast, a significant improvement was observed at 1 month after the surgery in almost all items of the patient-based questionnaires (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The objective activity tracker demonstrated that lumbar surgery results in the amount of activity decreasing 1 month just after surgery followed by gradual postoperative recovery within 3 months. In contrast, patient-based outcomes showed improvement in 1 month, which was significantly different from the change in actual activity, indicating the gap between the patient-oriented clinical score and their actual activities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: