Why the study?
Does switching from variable-dose multiple-pill ARB and thiazide combinations to a fixed-dose single-pill losartan and hydrochlorothiazide combination improve blood pressure and adherence in hypertensive outpatients?
Does switching from variable-dose multiple-pill ARB and thiazide combinations to a fixed-dose single-pill losartan and hydrochlorothiazide combination improve blood pressure and adherence in hypertensive outpatients?
Switching from multiple-pill ARB/thiazide regimens to a single-pill fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination improves blood pressure control and medication adherence in hypertensive patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support fixed-dose L/H for outpatient BP control; leaves open RCT confirmation of adherence and causality.
The efficacy and tolerability of switching therapy from free combinations of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and thiazide (A/T) to a fixed-dose of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide (L/H) has not been evaluated in Japan. We examined effects of switching therapy from variable-dose multiple-pill A/T to a fixed-dose L/H on blood pressure (BP) along with medication adherence and the degree of satisfaction in 91 hypertensive outpatients (mean age, 65.2 ± 9.6 years). After 6 months, a significant BP reduction (132 ± 9/76 ± 10 vs. 126 ± 12/72 ± 11 mm Hg), along with an improvement of attaining target BP (44.0 vs. 61.5%) and that of adherence, were observed. The magnitude of BP reduction in the participants increased their degree of satisfaction more significantly than in the participants who worsened their degree of satisfaction. The estimated glomerular filtration rate and the serum uric acid (UA) level decreased slightly but significantly. The hemoglobin A1c of participants with diabetes mellitus increased slightly but significantly. In conclusion, a switch in therapy from variable-dose, multiple-pill A/T combinations to a fixed-dose, single-pill L/H was effective in decreasing BP and serum UA in Japanese clinical practice. Metabolic side effects of L/H in patients with diabetes mellitus remain to be investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakima et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: