Why the study?
Does a biphasic waveform delivered from a single 336 microF capacitor maintain defibrillation efficacy compared to a standard biphasic waveform in patients undergoing ICD implantation?
Does a biphasic waveform delivered from a single 336 microF capacitor maintain defibrillation efficacy compared to a standard biphasic waveform in patients undergoing ICD implantation?
A single-capacitor biphasic waveform with a 60% tilt is feasible and requires lower delivered energy and peak voltage for defibrillation, potentially allowing for smaller and thinner ICDs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports single-capacitor 60% tilt waveform for ICD defibrillation; extends options for device miniaturization while maintaining efficacy.
AIMS: Improvements in the size and shape of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) might be obtained by using one capacitor instead of the series connection of two capacitors traditionally used in ICDs. The aim of this study was to determine whether a biphasic waveform delivered from a single 336 microF capacitor had the same defibrillation efficacy as a standard biphasic waveform. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized, paired defibrillation threshold testing was acutely performed in 54 patients undergoing ICD implantation. A standard 140 microF 80% tilt biphasic waveform (two 280 microF capacitors connected in series) was compared with an experimental biphasic waveform delivered from a single 336 microF capacitor at either 60% tilt (33 patients) or 80% tilt (21 patients). All waveforms had a 60/40 phase1/phase2 duration ratio. Compared with the standard waveform, the 60% tilt experimental waveform had a lower delivered energy (6.7 +/- 2.8 vs 7.9 +/- 3.3 joules, P<0.02), lower peak voltage (218 +/- 43 vs 333 +/- 68 V, P<0.01), and a slightly longer pulse duration (13.4 +/- 1.4 vs 10.7 +/- 1.1 ms, P<0.01). Conversely, the 80% tilt experimental waveform had a higher delivered energy (9.1 +/- 3.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.4 joules, P<0.01), a lower peak voltage (234 +/- 44 vs 302 +/- 51 V, P<0.01) and a much longer pulse duration (25.7 +/- 2.5 vs 1.13 +/- 1 ms, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Waveforms delivered from a large capacitance are feasible but require a lower tilt. This technique may allow smaller, thinner ICDs without jeopardizing defibrillation success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Josép Brugada (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: