Why the study?
Does blocking RAGE with a RAGE antibody prevent the development of cardiac dysfunction in a type 2 diabetic mouse model (db/db)?
Does blocking RAGE with a RAGE antibody prevent the development of cardiac dysfunction in a type 2 diabetic mouse model (db/db)?
In a type 2 diabetic mouse model, blocking RAGE with an antibody prevented the development of systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction and improved myocardial gene expression profiles.
RAGE blockade merits human investigation in diabetic cardiomyopathy; animal data leave clinical translation open.
AIMS: Activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is associated with long-term complications in diabetes mellitus. In this study, we tested whether RAGE activation in the diabetic myocardium is implicated in the development of cardiac dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using MRI and conductance catheter techniques, we evaluated cardiac function in a type 2 diabetic mouse model (db/db), and assessed the effect of blocking RAGE with a RAGE antibody. Gene expressions were evaluated in samples of myocardial tissue. Diabetic db/db mice demonstrated an accelerated age-dependent deterioration in cardiac function associated with altered expression of genes related to cardiac structure and function. Blockage of RAGE signalling prevented the reduction in systolic function (preload recruitable stroke work: 109.8 +/- 13.8 vs. 94.5 +/- 14.9 mmHg/microL, P = 0.04) and development of increased LV diastolic chamber stiffness (0.18 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.27 +/- 0.07 mmHg, P = 0.01). The cardiac expression of collagen (col1a1) was reduced by approximately 45% and the expression of myosin was switched from the foetal isoform (MHCbeta) to the adult isoform (MHCalpha). CONCLUSION: Activation of RAGE is a significant pathogenetic mechanism for the development of cardiac dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. The underlying mechanisms involve not only the passive biophysical properties of the myocardium but also myocyte function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: