Why the study?
Does R-wave response during stress testing accurately detect coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block at rest compared to ST-segment response?
Does R-wave response during stress testing accurately detect coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block at rest compared to ST-segment response?
R-wave response to exercise during stress testing provides higher specificity and predictive value than ST-segment depression for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with resting left bundle branch block.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
R-wave response may aid CAD detection in LBBB stress testing; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
The treadmill stress test and antiographic records of 18 patients with left bundle block on resting ECG were reviewed retrospectively. Thirteen of the patients had significant coronary artery disease defined as greater than or equal to 70% cross-sectional narrowing of one or more vessels, while 5 patients were hemodynamically and angiographically normal. The R-wave and ST-segment response to exercise were determined in each case and compared. A positive R-wave response was an exercise-induced increase or no change in amplitude over the baseline level, while a positive ST-segment response was greater than or equal to 2 mm of excerise-induced depression over the baseline level. The sensitivity for the R-wave response was 69% (9 of 13), the specificity was 100% (5 of 5), and the predictive value was 100% (9 of 9). For ST depression these values were 46% (6 of 13), 40% (2 of 5)8 and 67% (6 of 9). Although the number of patients in this study is small--a reflection of the fact that ST depression in the presence of left bundle branch block with exercise is associated with many false positive responses and hence less referral for stress testing--it appears that the R-wave response to exercise in the presence of left bundle branch block can accurately detect coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenberg et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: