A comparison between the hydrogen storage performances of untreated and heat-treated Li 3 N was carried out using a volumetric method, temperature-programmed hydrogenation (TPH), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It was found that, during the first hydrogenation, the untreated Li 3 N could absorb fast (3 min), 5.5 wt % of hydrogen at 230 °C, and that 3200 min was needed to absorb an additional 2.5 wt % of H 2 . In contrast, the Li 3 N preheated at 400 °C in a vacuum for 4.5 h absorbed only 3 wt % in 3 min at 230 °C but required only 300 min to absorb an additional 6.5 wt % of H 2 . Furthermore, during rehydrogenation after desorption, the pretreated Li 3 N could quickly absorb (3 min) 5.2 wt % of hydrogen, and this performance did not change with increasing hydrogenation−dehydrogenation cycle number. TPH and SEM investigations indicated that the higher performance of the preheated Li 3 N was due to its relatively large particle sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: