PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of (18)F-flurodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) in predicting malignancy of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 87 patients who have been scheduled to undergo surgery for thyroid nodule with indeterminate cytology. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT, multiparametric neck ultrasonography (MPUS), and (99m)Tc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintigraphy ((99m)Tc-MIBI-scan). Histopathology was the standard of reference. We compared the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (AC), positive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) values of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT with those of (99m)Tc-MIBI-scan and MPUS in detecting cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between each diagnostic tool and histopathology. RESULTS: On histopathology, 69 out of 87 nodules were found to be benign and 18 to be malignant. The SE, SP, AC, PPV and NPV of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were 94, 58, 66, 37 and 98% respectively. The SE, AC and NPV of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were significantly higher than those of MPUS and (99m)Tc-MIBI-scan. The association of both positive (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and MPUS (FDG+/MPUS+) showed significantly lower SE (61% vs 94%) and NPV (88% vs 98%) than (18)F-FDG-PET/CT alone, but significantly higher SP (77% vs 58%). On univariate analysis, (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and the combination of FDG+/MPUS+ and of FDG+/MIBI- were all significantly associated with histopathology. On multivariate analysis, only FDG+/MIBI- was significantly associated with histopathology. CONCLUSION: The AC of (18)F-FDG-PET /CT in detecting thyroid malignancy is higher than that of (99m)Tc-MIBI-scan and MPUS. A negative (18)F-FDG-PET/CT correctly predicts benign findings on histopathology. The association of FDG+/MPS+ is significantly more specific than (18)F-FDG-PET/CT alone in identifying differentiated thyroid cancer. A positive (18)F-FDG-PET/CT is significantly associated with malignancy when qualitative (99m)Tc-MIBI-scan is rated as negative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piccardo et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: