Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) is a T cell-mediated response to hapten sensitization of the epidermis. Recent results from this laboratory indicated that hapten sensitization induces two populations of hapten-reactive T cells: CD8+ T cells producing IFN-gamma, which mediate the response, and CD4+ T cells producing IL-4 and IL-10, which function to limit the magnitude and the duration of the response. In the current report we first examined the hapten-presenting cell priming each of these T cell populations and then examined the influence of CD4+ T cell priming on the development of the CD8+ effector T cells. Isolation of hapten-presenting Langerhans cells from the lymph nodes of oxazolone-sensitized mice and transfer to naive mice resulted in the induction of both the regulatory CD4+ and the effector CD8+ T populations. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing high levels of the activation determinants CD11a and CD44 appeared in the lymph nodes 3 days after hapten sensitization. The CD8+ T cells producing IFN-gamma and mediating CHS responses following transfer to naive mice were restricted to the high CD44-expressing population. In vitro activation of hapten-immune CD8+ T cells resulted in very low amounts (3 U/ml) of IL-2 production, whereas production of IL-2 by immune CD4+ T cells was approximately 70-fold higher (208 U/ml). Despite this discrepancy in IL-2 production and the coincidental priming of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by hapten-presenting Langerhans cells during hapten sensitization, the numbers of CD8+/high CD44-expressing T cells in the lymph nodes were nearly identical when CD4+ T cells were present or absent during hapten priming. These results indicate that coincidental priming of CD4+ (and CD8+) T cells by LC does not augment CD8+ T cell development in CHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: